Positive Property vs REIN — Coaching Costs or Cash Rebates?
Australians searching for financial freedom through property are often drawn to groups offering education, mentorship, or insider strategies. One such company is Positive Property, led by George Markoski, which promotes a coaching-style program. On the other side is REIN (Real Estate Investors Network), which has redefined property investing by eliminating membership fees and rebating commissions directly back to investors. The difference is simple: do you want to pay for coaching—or get paid to invest? What Positive Property Offers Positive Property provides coaching and mentorship designed to guide investors into positive cash flow properties over time. Its education-first model helps new investors understand strategy and build confidence But there’s a catch. Membership fees, program costs, and potential commissions tied to property recommendations can eat into the capital investors need most—the funds to actually buy property. For many, that slows the path to building wealth. How REIN Does It Differently REIN (Real Estate Investors Network) takes a radically different approach. Instead of charging for education or bundling coaching into high-priced memberships, REIN focuses on putting money back into investors’ pockets. – Every time an investor buys a property, REIN rebates part of the commission directly to the buyer. This is money that would otherwise go to agents, spruikers, or middlemen. From day one, investors benefit financially from every deal. The result is a simple, transparent, and investor-first model that accelerates portfolio growth without unnecessary costs. Coaching Fees vs Rebates At the heart of the difference is how each group structures costs. Positive Property: Charges coaching and program fees, reducing how much investors can put into actual properties. REIN: No fees, no hidden costs. Instead, buyers receive cash rebates that can be reinvested to grow wealth faster. It’s the difference between paying for advice and getting rewarded for investing. Side-by-Side Comparison | Feature | Positive Property | REIN (Real Estate Investors Network) | | Coaching / Program Fees | High membership and program costs | No fees – zero upfront cost | | Hidden Commissions | Lack of full clarity around property commissions | Full transparency – all commissions disclosed | | Cash Benefit to Buyer | None – fees reduce investor capital | Cash rebates returned directly to buyer | | Alignment with Investor | Revenue tied to memberships and commissions | Aligned with your savings and success | | Accessibility | High costs create barriers to entry | Affordable, transparent, and open to all investors | Why Transparency Matters One of the biggest problems with traditional property programs is the lack of clarity around commissions, developer ties, or the true cost to investors. Positive Property has been criticised for this lack of visibility. In contrast, REIN is built on full transparency. From day one, investors know: What properties are available. What commission is involved. How much they will receive back as a rebate. This clear outline removes uncertainty and gives investors’ confidence in their decisions. Encouraging Due Diligence We encourage all investors to verify the facts. Ask Positive Property about their fees, commissions, and developer arrangements. Then compare those answers with REIN’s rebate-first model. The contrast speaks for itself. Ready to See the Truth for Yourself? Most investors don’t realise how much they lose in hidden fees and commissions. REIN is the whistleblower in the industry, exposing outdated practices and giving buyers the power to save thousands. With just a simple chat, you can uncover how much better off you could be—on the very same property. 👉 Start Your Journey with REIN: https://start.realestateinvestorsnetwork.com.au/new-index-secure-php419952 Legal Disclaimer This content has been prepared for general information only. It is based on information assumed from publicly available sources about the relevant company. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy, completeness or currency of the information, and we accept no liability for any loss or damage suffered as a result of reliance on it. You should verify all details directly with the company concerned and obtain independent financial, legal or tax advice before making any decision. Nothing in this publication constitutes, or should be relied upon as, professional advice. To the maximum extent permitted by law, we expressly disclaim all liability and responsibility for any direct, indirect or consequential loss arising from use of, or reliance upon, this content.